 |
 |
 |
 |
||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| LETTERS |
| The
achievement of AidooAid, an
enviable milestone in man's quest to grow hair back on receding
hairline, balding hair--and, alopecia generally, including premature
hair loss; is one which has propelled this great scientist, inventor,
pioneer and educator: Professor Frank Aidoo into the arena of world
recognition.
The following are some of the many letters sent to doctors and scientist around the world to introduce the achievement of AidooAid :
Aidoo
International Research & Marketing Inc.,
David
Kessler, M.D. April 26, 1996 Dear Dr. Kessler, Re: AidooAid The Bald No More System. This is my second letter to you exactly two years todate; on the above product--the end result of my 20 years of research work. I am a research scientist in the field of Enzymes and Alkaloids. My work has led to the discovery of 35 virgin formats of enzymatic traits, and 12 master alkaloids pre-emptors of invaluable accord to humankind... In my letter of April 22, 1994, I contested the ruling you made in January 1990 concerning Rogaine. The assertion was unequivocal in your statement. It was that--and I quote: " Rogaine with 2% minoxidil is the only product proven to stimulate hair growth." un quote. The above ruling is what led me to write you the letter referred to above; of which I am enclosing a copy; and other scientific data collected over the years legitimizing in total--the statement: AidooAid The Bald No More System actually grows hair!...And that it grows hair on sufferers of alopecia, including arieta, totalis and androgenetica. (commonly known as male and female pattern baldness). And unlike Rogaine, it has no side effects; and it grows hair on all areas of the head -- not the vertex area alone, but also frontal and what I call "annexal areas and patches." I had included the pictorial documentation to accent the uniqueness of my work. Your action has led to a state within which my life’s work was deduced to "semi-fraud" in the face of those who heard our claim that: AidooAid actually grows hair! In spite of the fact that I sent you all this information, your department was aware of this breakthrough sometime back in June 1992, in which an article was written about my work in the Sun Telegraph newspaper of San Bernardino, California; and an interview with The Los Angeles Times. Before publication, your office was contacted and a statement relayed to the above newspaper by your west coast bureau spokesperson: Mike Shaffer, conceded to our validity, and yet, there was no attempt on your part to redress or rescind your statement. Rogaine has been proven not to grow hair as ascribed by your office... It is ineffective, and by that dimension, has destroyed the public’s view and perception toward legitimate claims such as ours. It cannot grow--and this is for refutation purposes: one hundred th of hair AidooAid is capable of... AidooAid does not stimulate hair growth as asserted by Rogaine’s outlay... It actually re-activates the dormant hair follicles to grow hair again!...And it does not take 4 months or longer like Rogaine: ...The fact that it works with the follicles, the re-activation becomes evident within two to three weeks upon use, sometimes before! And being arranged with an organic coenzs, the new hair does not fall "off" with reduction or cessation of use. And therefore, unlike Rogaine, it is not a lifelong proposition...You have all this, including all the pertinent scientific data on your record! My work has revealed that there is an unnatural membrane which I call: gHanape-bio. It grows to hinder--restricting the "free flow" of sebumatic factors to the follicles. Once the gHanape-bio is debased, the follicle(s) assume accord of viability--growing hair again into its anagenic state. I love America, and I want America to benefit from my findings and discoveries. And as a scientist, there have been times when I have thought of selling my work to other nations and pharmaceutical companies... In essence, offer them the leadership in this arena. I need
to be accorded a reply to this my second letter; to which copies
are also sent to the names enumerated below.
Sincerely, Frank
Aidoo. Ph.D cc. News
Editor CNN cc. Editor: New York Times
Frank Aidoo Ph.D, Dear Dr. Aidoo: This is in response to your letter of July 27, 1997, to Senator John McCain regarding your product AidooAid. Senator McCain requested that we respond directly to you. According to your letter, two previous letters you sent the Food and Drug Administration (FDA or the Agency) were not answered. We want you to know that the Agency has no record of having received these letters, and we are sorry for the frustration you have experienced in not receiving answers. From the information provided in your letter, we believe your product has the potential to be considered a drug under the provisions of sections 201(g) and 201(p) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FDC) Act (pertinent sections enclosed) which define what is considered a drug under the law. Also enclosed is a copy of section 310.527 of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). This section provides information on products for hair growth or hair loss prevention FDA regulates the manufacture, sale, and distribution of drugs in the United States under the authority of the FDC Act, and reviews the data included in New Drug Applications (NDAs) that are submitted for approval. Enclosed is a copy of an FDA consumer special report entitled "From Test Tube to Patient: New Drug Development in the United States." This report will provide a general overview of the drug development process. After reading this report, you may wish to refer to the FDC Act and Title 21, CFR from the Government Printing Office (GPO). These references contain information such as regulatory definitions and the data needed to support an approval of an NDA and marketing regulations (there will be a charge for these manuals). Title 21, CFR is available through our website at: www.fda.gov/cder. Select the "Regulatory Guidance" icon, then select "Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations." You may also wish to visit your local library and consult these references. Finally, you can purchase copies through GPO. The GPO can be reached at the following phone number and address: The Government Printing Office Superintendent of
Documents If you decide to pursue the development of these products, you can contact the Drug Information Branch and request an Investigational New Drug (IND) package. The Drug Information office can provide information on any organizations, grants, or other agencies that assist small drug businesses. If you wish to contact them, they can be reached at the following phone number and address: Food and Drug Information (HFD-210) 5600 Fishers
Lane For information on user fees, please contact the Office of External Affairs, Industry Liaison Staff at (301) 827-3430. They can send you a package that contains all of the current information on user fees. Please note that small businesses can apply for a user fee exemption. We hope this information is helpful. Sincerely Diane E. Thompson 3 Enclosures Section 201 FDC Act 21 CFR section
310.527 FDA Consumer,
Senator John McCain, Dear Senator, AidooAid A Scientific Breakthrough As per my e-mail of July 27, 1997, I hereby enclose the pertinent documents I advised will be sent under a separate cover. I take this moment to thank you in advance for the speedy attention offered to my e-mails. Again, thank you. Sir, as the attached letter (copy) sent to the then Commissioner of FDA Dr. David Kessler will show, I am a research scientist in the field of Enzyme and Alkaloid. My work has lead to the discovery of 35 newly formatted Enzymes; and 12 Virgin Alkaloids of unparalleled importance within the medium of science. I have unraveled and utilized the virtues coherent within one Enzymatic base--and supported it with an adjunct (co-enzyme) in an empirical scientific arrangement to achieve a breakthrough in the "re-activation" of the dormant hair follicles to GROW HAIR again! ...Being that this order of achievement is organic in it's accentuation, it grows hair on all types of hair, and does not produce any side effects. ...Within some of my other prevailing base(s) of Enzymes and Alkaloids--all being proprietary with legible style of conduction, there exist discoveries bearing composers of other biological effusers capable of suppressing and normalizing--in some cases: "idiopathic" human abnormalities and diseases. Over 5 years ago, a local newspaper hearing of my work sent a team to cover it. (Sun Telegraph of San Bernardino, California). Being that the FDA had asserted there was nothing but Rogaine--a product serendipitously discovered, and fundamentally a Drug for the controlling of hypertension--and marked as a topical "hair growing" product, I requested the Commissioner to rescind his words; or investigate my claim. I have spent over 20 years in this field of research--collecting data pictorially; and studying the different forms of alopecia left to conjecture within the scientific community...of which I have tonated usable terminology for their identification. I submitted my work to AMA and over 1000 physicians in the field of dermatology; including notable medical schools; and have been shunned due to the statement made by the then commissioner in 1991 concerning Rogaine. On two consecutive times, I wrote Dr. Kessler providing him with all the necessary information for revision; with no acknowledgement or reply resulting... Sir, I believe that America being the world leader within the field of science can only hold on to it's leadership when people like myself are accorded due recognition and equity--even in science; especially, when I hold the secret to this phenomenon...including others yet to be revealed. My request is based on the fundamental truth--which we all seek for: especially when a statement is antithesis to the prevailing in science. Sir, I have provided all the pre-requisite needed for revisiting the Commissioner's statement; and have also written to Governor Pete Wilson of California--as I reside in his state (copy attached). I have since then received an unceremonious visit by an individual who announced himself as an FTC agent, who, after seeing the postings of documents and pictures of "before and after" of some users in my office, has failed to "officially" announce his findings. Sir, I wish and request that your office and chair investigate what I have brought before you. In a country where innovation and creativeness are encouraged, I can only site a scenario of inadvertency on Dr. Kessler's part; because, by all account--notwithstanding the scientific and pictorial submitted, the statement made in his capacity, clearly, legitimized Rogaine with monopolistic stripes: an official rubber stamp--in essence, in an industry where they have not been able to show any "scientific-pictorial" proof:; especially, when the statement was with all accord of conviction and honesty of an FDA Commissioner.. Unfortunately, the said product (Rogaine) has since failed to live up to it's relish: Based on what I have submitted, and by virtue of the fact that my work has global connotation and meaning, that, I be accorded an investigation into my citation... I am yours sincerely,
Frank Aidoo Ph.D. *Sir, my work is posted on the internet--with the world wide address: This information and other may be accessed; and are for your perusal...
cc: Committee Members
Enc:
August 18, 1997
Re:
AidooAid I have received your letter of October 21, 1997, in answer to one on my behalf from Senator John McCain: the chairman of the U.S. Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation. I was taken “aback” by inference that you did not receive my letter sent to the department—addressed to the former commissioner Dr. David Kessler. To establish the viability of my letter, I enclose herewith the “return receipt” of delivery from the U.S. Postal Service. In reading your response, I notice the “theme” of my letter—the contention and the essence of it—being the statement made by the then commissioner that Rogaine is the only product proven to grow hair was not addressed. As I commented, the statement was emphatical, very conclusive. It appeared to have represented the totality of scientific motion, and as such resonated across the GLOBE—measuring with his stand as the Commissioner of Unite States Food & Drug Administration (FDA). Ms. Thompson, the fact of the matter is: my 12 year old son and his classmates cannot understand why they clearly see in accord ’hair’ on PEOPLE WHO DID NOT HAVE HAIR, (after examining pictures/data of users of AidooAid and meeting some…) but are in essence accosted to disregard the prevailing, and are to adopt words of a trusted keeper of United States government—totally inconsistent—and at odd with what they clearly see with their reasoning: It demarcates their understanding; and are left confused and frustrated! --Pertaining to classification of products, my research which covered more than 20 years, also measured the categories under which “cosmetics and natural based” products are augmented under the laws of the United States as enumerated under the FDA guidelines.(By your suggestion, I have re-visited them thoroughly—concentrating on the define of “herbal,” as the base of my work fits more under this category.) AidooAid is a “scientific breakthrough” that uses a NON-DRUG base! And are unlike “drug” based products such as Minoxidel (Rogaine by Upjohn), and Finasteride (Merck’s Proscar), a drug awaiting your conferation. Science, I believe, and trust you will agree is still evolving. It does not have answer(s) to all our ill(s) and will never. Your inversion that it is only “drug” that has the ability to grow hair has no bases; and by the data and support I have collected to date deems that adage to be totally false. My work therefore, has made such theory held before the emergence of AidooAid obsolete, since the “proof and evidence” presented cannot be refuted. At this state, I request as a matter of scientific fact, that, a statement be made to the effect that AidooAid has the ability to re-activate the “dormant hair follicle” to grow hair again…and more so that Rogaine or Finasteride; and without any of the side effects; being that it utilizes “a breakthrough” catelization of enzymatic order, to which the data and pictorial submitted to date suffice… As I stated in my letter to the Senator—in his esteem capacity, I believe this great NATION called America epitomizes progress and truth; and I also believe your department was requested to answer my citation. This warrants clarification in view of the fact that AidooAid grows hair…and achieves an unprecedented result, far capable than any product out in the market (being those bearing activance of Drug, OTC, Homeopathic or botanical/herbal preparation). Frank
Aidoo Ph.D cc:
Senator John McCain
January 5, 1998 Frank Aidoo, Ph.D. Dear Dr. Aidoo: I am responding to your November 17, 1997, letter to Diane Thompson at the Food and Drug Administration regarding your product AidooAid. Your letter has been referred to the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research for a reply. As stated in Ms. Thompson's October 21, 1997, letter to you, we consider your product to be a drug under the provisions of section 201(g) and 201(p) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, therefore the product may not be legally marketed unless the product has an approved New Drug application (NDA). Further, regulation coveing hair growht products in Part 310.527(b) (copy enclosed) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regualations (21 CFR) state: "(b) Any OTC drug product that is labeled, represented , or promoted for external use as a hair grower or for hiar loss prevention is regareded as a new drugh within the meaning of section 201(p) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act), for which an approved new drug application under section 505 of the act and part 314 of this chapter is required for marketing. In the absence of an approved new drug application, such product is also misbranded under section 502 of the act." We are sending, under separate cover, the document and forms for filing an NDA. The NDA must contain adequate data, including clinical trials, which establish that the drugs is safe and effective for the intended use. This is the process of proving that your product is effective, which has been the focus of your letter. The regualtions covering the NDA process are found in 21 CFR 312 and 314. The agency will be more that willing to review your new drug application and clinical data supporting claims of safety and efficacy for the AidooAid product. Once a completed new drug application is received we can begin the review process of your product. If you need additional guidance documents pertaining to submission of a new drug application please request them from our Drug Information Branch at 301-594-4573. Sincerely yours, Celia A. DeLawter Executive Secretartiat (HFD-6) Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Aidoo
International Research & Marketing Inc.,
Dear Dr. Re: AidooAid The Bald No More System. This letter is to introduce you to a "new" discovery -- an all natural base of Enzyme and Alkaloids with the ability to "re-activate" the dormant hair follicles to grow hair again. A breakthrough discovery by Frank Aidoo. Ph.D., a Research Scientist in the field of Enzyme and Alkaloids. ...An empirical work spanning over 20 years in isolation and circumscription has led to this find: an organic catalyst of an enzymatic order -- punctuated with co-enzymes of "newly" discovered alkaloidic property to re-activating the "dormant hair follicles" to grow hair again into its anagenic state. The result, therefore, is a product that elicits growth (of hair) on sufferers of: Alopecia: (arieta, totalis or androgenic). Arranged under a newly isolate vertex of covalency, it provides all the natural composites; including proteinic virtues to build triapite sebumatic factors to yield growth. ...Compounded with natural composites, there are fewer denaturing within the base; resulting therefore, in a predictable hair growth in 99.9% of cases of those who suffer with arieta, totalis and infantal androgenetica. Unlike Rogaine -- composite of minoxidil; AidooAid The Bald No More System elicit vertex and frontal (receding hairline) growth; including q/marks and annexial patches. It also has no side effects; and being biologically semblance to the requisite of the follicle’s traits, once the individual has achieved the result needed, he/she could switch to our Phase2 formula: the maintenance kit. Using AidooAid, therefore, is not a life long proposition. The new hair also remains with all the attributes of anagency...as nature then recur itself! This product has gone through all rigor: and is marketed unequivocally as "hair growing product." It is also a breakthrough known to the FDA, including other agencies. We are enclosing herewith: other scientific documentation (in the form of pictures of: before and after of some users). You will also notice there has been some news coverage (investigative) by some respectable newspapers here in California. We enclose also price list, and a poster for your office. Thank
you. Harold
"HK" Kennedy, HK/cc
|
||||||
 |
||||||
|
Aidoo
International Research & Marketing, Inc.
Copyright 1996, Aidoo International Research & Marketing, Inc. |
