| The
achievement of AidooAid, an
enviable milestone in man's quest to grow hair back on receding
hairline, balding hair--and, alopecia generally, including premature
hair loss; is one which has propelled this great scientist, inventor,
pioneer and educator: Professor Frank Aidoo into the arena of
world recognition. The
following are some of the many letters sent to doctors and scientist
around the world to introduce the achievement of AidooAid :
L
Aidoo International
Research & Marketing Inc.,
360 S. Milliken Ave, Suite G, Ontario CA. 91761
Tel: (909) 605 7788 Fax: (909) 605 7789
David Kessler, M.D.
April 26, 1996-2000
Commissioner: Food & Drug Administration,
5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857-001
Dear Dr. Kessler,
Re: AidooAid
The Bald No More System.
This is my second letter
to you exactly two years todate; on the above product--the end
result of my 20 years of research work.
I am a research scientist
in the field of Enzymes and Alkaloids. My work has led to the
discovery of 35 virgin formats of enzymatic traits, and 12 master
alkaloids pre-emptors of invaluable accord to humankind...
In my letter of April
22, 1994, I contested the ruling you made in January 1990 concerning
Rogaine. The assertion was unequivocal in your statement. It
was that--and I quote: " Rogaine with 2% minoxidil is the only
product proven to stimulate hair growth." un quote.
The above ruling is
what led me to write you the letter referred to above; of which
I am enclosing a copy; and other scientific data collected over
the years legitimizing in total--the statement: AidooAid The
Bald No More System actually grows hair!...And that it grows
hair on sufferers of alopecia, including arieta, totalis and
androgenetica. (commonly known as male and female pattern baldness).
And unlike Rogaine, it has no side effects; and it grows hair
on all areas of the head -- not the vertex area alone, but also
frontal and what I call "annexal areas and patches."
I had included the
pictorial documentation to accent the uniqueness of my work.
Your action has led
to a state within which my life’s work was deduced to "semi-fraud"
in the face of those who heard our claim that: AidooAid
actually grows hair!
In spite of the fact
that I sent you all this information, your department was aware
of this breakthrough sometime back in June 1992, in which an
article was written about my work in the Sun Telegraph newspaper
of San Bernardino, California; and an interview with The Los
Angeles Times.
Before publication,
your office was contacted and a statement relayed to the above
newspaper by your west coast bureau spokesperson: Mike Shaffer,
conceded to our validity, and yet, there was no attempt on your
part to redress or rescind your statement.
Rogaine has been proven
not to grow hair as ascribed by your office... It is ineffective,
and by that dimension, has destroyed the public’s view and perception
toward legitimate claims such as ours. It cannot grow--and this
is for refutation purposes: one hundred th of hair AidooAid
is capable of... AidooAid
does not stimulate hair growth as asserted by Rogaine’s outlay...
It actually re-activates the dormant hair follicles to grow
hair again!...And it does not take 4 months or longer like Rogaine:
...The fact that it works with the follicles, the re-activation
becomes evident within two to three weeks upon use, sometimes
before! And being arranged with an organic coenzs, the new hair
does not fall "off" with reduction or cessation of use. And
therefore, unlike Rogaine, it is not a lifelong proposition...You
have all this, including all the pertinent scientific data on
your record!
My work has revealed
that there is an unnatural membrane which I call: gHanape-bio.
It grows to hinder--restricting the "free flow" of sebumatic
factors to the follicles. Once the gHanape-bio is debased, the
follicle(s) assume accord of viability--growing hair again into
its anagenic state.
I love America, and
I want America to benefit from my findings and discoveries.
And as a scientist, there have been times when I have thought
of selling my work to other nations and pharmaceutical companies...
In essence, offer them the leadership in this arena.
I need to be accorded
a reply to this my second letter; to which copies are also sent
to the names enumerated below.
Sincerely,
Frank Aidoo. Ph.D
Enzyme & Alkaloids Research Scientist
cc. News Editor CNN
cc. Editor: New York Times
cc. Editor: Washington Post cc. American Academy of Dermatology
cc. Governor Pete Wilson. cc. Mike Shaffer, West Coast office
FDA
OCT 21 1997
Frank Aidoo
Ph.D,
601 S. Milliken Avenue Suite P Ontario,
California 91761
Dear Dr.
Aidoo:
This is in
response to your letter of July 27, 1997, to Senator John McCain
regarding your product AidooAid. Senator McCain requested that
we respond directly to you.
According
to your letter, two previous letters you sent the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or the Agency) were not answered. We want
you to know that the Agency has no record of having received
these letters, and we are sorry for the frustration you have
experienced in not receiving answers.
From the
information provided in your letter, we believe your product
has the potential to be considered a drug under the provisions
of sections 201(g) and 201(p) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic (FDC) Act (pertinent sections enclosed) which define
what is considered a drug under the law. Also enclosed is a
copy of section 310.527 of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR). This section provides information on products for hair
growth or hair loss prevention
FDA regulates
the manufacture, sale, and distribution of drugs in the United
States under the authority of the FDC Act, and reviews the data
included in New Drug Applications (NDAs) that are submitted
for approval. Enclosed is a copy of an FDA consumer special
report entitled "From Test Tube to Patient: New Drug Development
in the United States." This report will provide a general overview
of the drug development process. After reading this report,
you may wish to refer to the FDC Act and Title 21, CFR from
the Government Printing Office (GPO). These references contain
information such as regulatory definitions and the data needed
to support an approval of an NDA and marketing regulations (there
will be a charge for these manuals). Title 21, CFR is available
through our website at: www.fda.gov/cder. Select the "Regulatory
Guidance" icon, then select "Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations."
You may also wish to visit your local library and consult these
references. Finally, you can purchase copies through GPO. The
GPO can be reached at the following phone number and address:
The Government
Printing Office Superintendent of Documents
Attention: New Orders
P.O. Box 371954 Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania 15250-7954
Phone: (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2250
If you decide
to pursue the development of these products, you can contact
the Drug Information Branch and request an Investigational New
Drug (IND) package. The Drug Information office can provide
information on any organizations, grants, or other agencies
that assist small drug businesses. If you wish to contact them,
they can be reached at the following phone number and address:
Food and
Drug Information (HFD-210) 5600 Fishers Lane
Rockville, Maryland 20857
Phone: (301) 827-4573
For information
on user fees, please contact the Office of External Affairs,
Industry Liaison Staff at (301) 827-3430. They can send you
a package that contains all of the current information on user
fees. Please note that small businesses can apply for a user
fee exemption.
We hope this
information is helpful.
Sincerely
Diane E. Thompson
Associate Commissioner for Legislative Affairs
3 Enclosures
Section 201 FDC Act 21 CFR section 310.527 FDA Consumer,
"From Test Tube to Patient"
July 27, 1997
Senator John McCain,
Chairman U.S. Committee on Commerce,
Science & Transportation.
Washington DC.
Dear Senator,
AidooAid:
A Scientific Breakthrough
As per my e-mail of July
27, 1997, I hereby enclose the pertinent documents I advised
will be sent under a separate cover.
I take this moment to
thank you in advance for the speedy attention offered to my
e-mails. Again, thank you.
Sir, as the attached letter
(copy) sent to the then Commissioner of FDA Dr. David
Kessler will show, I am a research scientist in the field of
Enzyme and Alkaloid. My work has lead to the discovery
of 35 newly formatted Enzymes; and 12 Virgin Alkaloids of unparalleled
importance within the medium of science.
I have unraveled and utilized
the virtues coherent within one Enzymatic base--and supported
it with an adjunct (co-enzyme) in an empirical scientific arrangement
to achieve a breakthrough in the "re-activation" of
the dormant hair follicles to GROW HAIR again! ...Being that
this order of achievement is organic in it's accentuation, it
grows hair on all types of hair, and does not produce any side
effects.
...Within some of my other
prevailing base(s) of Enzymes and Alkaloids--all being proprietary
with legible style of conduction, there exist discoveries bearing
composers of other biological effusers capable of suppressing
and normalizing--in some cases: "idiopathic" human
abnormalities and diseases.
Over 5 years ago, a local
newspaper hearing of my work sent a team to cover it. (Sun Telegraph
of San Bernardino, California). Being that the FDA had
asserted there was nothing but Rogaine--a product serendipitously
discovered, and fundamentally a Drug for the controlling of
hypertension--and marked as a topical "hair growing"
product, I requested the Commissioner to rescind his words;
or investigate my claim. I have spent over 20 years in
this field of research--collecting data pictorially; and studying
the different forms of alopecia left to conjecture within the
scientific community...of which I have tonated usable terminology
for their identification.
I submitted my work to
AMA and over 1000 physicians in the field of dermatology; including
notable medical schools; and have been shunned due to the statement
made by the then commissioner in 1991 concerning Rogaine.
On two consecutive times,
I wrote Dr. Kessler providing him with all the necessary information
for revision; with no acknowledgement or reply resulting...
Sir, I believe that America
being the world leader within the field of science can only
hold on to it's leadership when people like myself are accorded
due recognition and equity--even in science; especially, when
I hold the secret to this phenomenon...including others yet
to be revealed.
My request is based on
the fundamental truth--which we all seek for: especially when
a statement is antithesis to the prevailing in science.
Sir, I have provided all the pre-requisite needed for revisiting
the Commissioner's statement; and have also written to Governor
Pete Wilson of California--as I reside in his state (copy attached).
I have since then received
an unceremonious visit by an individual who announced himself
as an FTC agent, who, after seeing the postings of documents
and pictures of "before and after" of some users in
my office, has failed to "officially" announce his
findings.
Sir, I wish and request
that your office and chair investigate what I have brought before
you. In a country where innovation and creativeness are
encouraged, I can only site a scenario of inadvertency on Dr.
Kessler's part; because, by all account--notwithstanding the
scientific and pictorial submitted, the statement made in his
capacity, clearly, legitimized Rogaine with monopolistic stripes:
an official rubber stamp--in essence, in an industry where they
have not been able to show any "scientific-pictorial"
proof:; especially, when the statement was with all accord of
conviction and honesty of an FDA Commissioner.. Unfortunately,
the said product (Rogaine) has since failed to live up to it's
relish: Based on what I have submitted, and by virtue of the
fact that my work has global connotation and meaning, that,
I be accorded an investigation into my citation...
I am yours sincerely,
Frank Aidoo Ph.D.
*Sir, my work is posted
on the internet--with the world wide address:
www.aidooaid.com
This information and
other may be accessed; and are for your perusal...
cc:
Committee Members
Senators:
|
Ted
Stevens, Alaska
Conrad Burns, Montana
Slade Gortan, Washington
Trent Lott, Mississippi
Kay Bailey Hutchison, Texas
Olympia J. Snowe, Maine
John Ashcroft, Missouri
William Frist, Tennessee
Spencer Abraham, Michigan
Sam Brownback, Kansas
|
Senators:
|
Ersnest
F. Hollings, South Carolina
Daniel K. Inouye, Hawaii
Wendell H. Ford, Kentucky
John D. Rockefeller IV, West Virginia
John F. Kerry, Massachusetts
John B. Breaux, Louisiana
Richard H. Bryan, Nevada
Byron L. Dorgan, North Dakota
Ron Wyden, Oregon |
Enc:
COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION
WASHINGTON, DC 20510-6125
August 18,
1997
Mr. Frank Aidoo
Aidoo International 601 S. Milliken Ave.,
Suite P Ontario, CA 91761
Dear Mr. Aidoo:
Thank you for your letter regarding Aidoo Aid and the enzyme
and alkaloid research that you have been conducting. I am always
glad to have the opportunity to be of assistance
I have contacted the Associate Commissioner for Health Affairs
at the Food and Drug Administration about the difficulty that
you have encountered with Aidoo on your behalf. I have asked
for a prompt response to be sent directly to you.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any further
questions or comments.
Sincerely,
John McCain
Chairman
JM/bm
Diane E. Thompson,
Associate Commissioner for Legislative Affairs,
U.S. Food & Drug
Administration,
Rockville, MD 20857
Dear
Ms. Thompson.
Re: AidooAid
I have received your letter
of October 21, 1997, in answer to one on my behalf from Senator
John McCain: the chairman of the U.S. Committee on Commerce,
Science and Transportation.
I was taken “aback”
by inference that you did not receive my letter sent to the
department—addressed to the former commissioner Dr. David Kessler.
To establish the viability
of my letter, I enclose herewith the “return receipt” of delivery
from the U.S. Postal Service.
In reading your response,
I notice the “theme” of my letter—the contention and the essence
of it—being the statement made by the then commissioner that
Rogaine is the only product proven to grow hair was not addressed.
As I commented, the statement
was emphatical, very conclusive. It appeared to have represented
the totality of scientific motion, and as such resonated across
the GLOBE—measuring with his stand as the Commissioner of Unite
States Food & Drug Administration (FDA).
Ms. Thompson, the fact
of the matter is: my 12 year old son and his classmates cannot
understand why they clearly see in accord ’hair’ on PEOPLE WHO
DID NOT HAVE HAIR, (after examining pictures/data of users
of AidooAid and meeting some…) but are in essence accosted
to disregard the prevailing, and are to adopt words of a trusted
keeper of United States government—totally inconsistent—and
at odd with what they clearly see with their reasoning:
It demarcates their understanding; and are left confused and
frustrated!
--Pertaining to classification
of products, my research which covered more than 20 years, also
measured the categories under which “cosmetics and natural based”
products are augmented under the laws of the United States as
enumerated under the FDA guidelines.(By your suggestion,
I have re-visited them thoroughly—concentrating on the define
of “herbal,” as the base of my work fits more under this category.)
AidooAid is a “scientific
breakthrough” that uses a NON-DRUG base! And are unlike “drug”
based products such as Minoxidel (Rogaine by Upjohn), and Finasteride
(Merck’s Proscar), a drug awaiting your conferation.
Science, I believe, and
trust you will agree is still evolving. It does not have
answer(s) to all our ill(s) and will never. Your inversion
that it is only “drug” that has the ability to grow hair has
no bases; and by the data and support I have collected to date
deems that adage to be totally false. My work therefore,
has made such theory held before the emergence of AidooAid obsolete,
since the “proof and evidence” presented cannot be refuted.
At this state, I request
as a matter of scientific fact, that, a statement be made to
the effect that AidooAid has the ability to re-activate the
“dormant hair follicle” to grow hair again…and more so that
Rogaine or Finasteride; and without any of the side effects;
being that it utilizes “a breakthrough” catelization of enzymatic
order, to which the data and pictorial submitted to date suffice…
As I stated in my letter
to the Senator—in his esteem capacity, I believe this great
NATION called America epitomizes progress and truth; and I also
believe your department was requested to answer my citation.
This warrants clarification in view of the fact that AidooAid
grows hair…and achieves an unprecedented result, far capable
than any product out in the market (being those bearing activance
of Drug, OTC, Homeopathic or botanical/herbal preparation).
As you may have
seen the pictorial data presented on our internet site, AidooAid
grows hair on sufferers of male and female pattern baldness
(Androgenic Alopecia).
It stops hair loss; and unlike the others, it works well
on both frontal and vertex hair loss; and being that the base
is organic in composition, when a user discontinue its use after
he/she has grown their hair back, the hair does not fall out!
…This is achieved because of the fact that it is not a drug like
Minoxidel or Finasteride where cessation of use denotes resumption
of hair loss…and is meant therefore to be used indefinitely.
–They are drugs! —And as such unnaturally cajoles/stimulates
growth: usually “vellus” hair growth, while AidooAid facilitates
the “dormant hair follicle” to use its own chemistry to grow hair
back naturally—resulting in the pictorial and data posted: one
that cannot be duplicated using any DRUG-BASED PRODUCT.
I have posted documents detailing my work including over one hundred
pictorial data substantiation its efficacy. It should also be
conferred that my work is a BREAKTHROUGH IN THIS FIELD OF SCIENTIFIC
RESEARCH and REASONING, and for the sake of human progress should
be embraced. As an empiricist, it would be appropriate to
understand that my theory and its format are markedly antithesis
to the prevailing, as it further enhances man’s ability to redress
some of the “idiopathic” complexities from a different angle:
such as the one used in achieving the results I have presented
including others yet to be revealed…
I look forward to your certain reply.
Frank
Aidoo Ph.D
cc:
Senator John McCain
January 5,
1998
Frank Aidoo,
Ph.D.
Aidoo Internation Research & Marketing, Inc.
601 S. Milliken Avenue, Suite P
Ontario, CA 91761
Dear Dr.
Aidoo:
I am responding
to your November 17, 1997, letter to Diane Thompson at the Food
and Drug Administration regarding your product AidooAid. Your
letter has been referred to the Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research for a reply.
As stated
in Ms. Thompson's October 21, 1997, letter to you, we consider
your product to be a drug under the provisions of section 201(g)
and 201(p) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, therefore
the product may not be legally marketed unless the product has
an approved New Drug application (NDA). Further, regulation
coveing hair growht products in Part 310.527(b) (copy enclosed)
of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regualations (21 CFR) state:
"(b)
Any OTC drug product that is labeled, represented , or promoted
for external use as a hair grower or for hiar loss prevention
is regareded as a new drugh within the meaning of section 201(p)
of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act), for which
an approved new drug application under section 505 of the act
and part 314 of this chapter is required for marketing. In the
absence of an approved new drug application, such product is
also misbranded under section 502 of the act."
We are sending,
under separate cover, the document and forms for filing an NDA.
The NDA must contain adequate data, including clinical trials,
which establish that the drugs is safe and effective for the
intended use. This is the process of proving that your product
is effective, which has been the focus of your letter. The regualtions
covering the NDA process are found in 21 CFR 312 and 314. The
agency will be more that willing to review your new drug application
and clinical data supporting claims of safety and efficacy for
the AidooAid product. Once a completed new drug application
is received we can begin the review process of your product.
If you need additional guidance documents pertaining to submission
of a new drug application please request them from our Drug
Information Branch at 301-594-4573.
Sincerely
yours,
Celia A.
DeLawter
Executive
Secretartiat (HFD-6)
Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research
Letter
to Doctors:
Aidoo International
Research & Marketing Inc.,
360 S. Milliken Ave, Suite G,Ontario, CA. 92761.
Tel: (909) 605 7788 Fax: (909) 605 7789.
Dear Dr.
Re: AidooAid
The Bald No More System.
This letter is to introduce
you to a "new" discovery -- an all natural base of Enzyme and
Alkaloids with the ability to "re-activate" the dormant hair
follicles to grow hair again.
A breakthrough discovery
by Frank Aidoo. Ph.D., a Research Scientist in the field of
Enzyme and Alkaloids. ...An empirical work spanning over 20
years in isolation and circumscription has led to this find:
an organic catalyst of an enzymatic order -- punctuated with
co-enzymes of "newly" discovered alkaloidic property to re-activating
the "dormant hair follicles" to grow hair again into its anagenic
state.
The result, therefore,
is a product that elicits growth (of hair) on sufferers of:
Alopecia: (arieta, totalis or androgenic).
Arranged under a newly
isolate vertex of covalency, it provides all the natural composites;
including proteinic virtues to build triapite sebumatic factors
to yield growth.
...Compounded with
natural composites, there are fewer denaturing within the base;
resulting therefore, in a predictable hair growth in 99.9% of
cases of those who suffer with arieta, totalis and infantal
androgenetica. Unlike Rogaine -- composite of minoxidil; AidooAid
The Bald No More System elicit vertex and frontal (receding
hairline) growth; including q/marks and annexial patches.
It also has no side
effects; and being biologically semblance to the requisite of
the follicle’s traits, once the individual has achieved the
result needed, he/she could switch to our Phase2 formula: the
maintenance kit.
Using AidooAid,
therefore, is not a life long proposition. The new hair also
remains with all the attributes of anagency...as nature then
recur itself!
This product has gone
through all rigor: and is marketed unequivocally as "hair growing
product." It is also a breakthrough known to the FDA, including
other agencies.
We are enclosing herewith:
other scientific documentation (in the form of pictures of:
before and after of some users). You will also notice there
has been some news coverage (investigative) by some respectable
newspapers here in California. We enclose also price list, and
a poster for your office.
Thank you.
Harold "HK" Kennedy,
Physicians Marketing Director.
HK/cc
***enc.
|
